Quote from: Ebisu_rkz on October 13, 2017, 07:04:14 PM

Quote from: alef321 on October 13, 2017, 12:55:08 PM

I like the idea a guy posted on steam I think where you always get faction points,character points and gold but you can choose one to get an extra bonus , also no sharing with team members (that just creates dispute and toxicity)

also blueprints still do the roullete but you can still choose the bonus on a currency , the idea of getting nothing after a hard mission is just gut blasting.

I would like to see something like that, IIRC it was suggested during the beta period too.

Right now imo, it is too random and frustrating, you can get 15k gold with one mission or something like 1.5k-500 most missions. My impression is that I am losing my time until I get one of that missions of 10k-15k (and with some luck wont get splitted), which are completely random, you can win a hard mission with great score and against an antagonist and get no blueprint or a blue blueprint to boost the rewards, but not close to a yellow blueprint.

I also think that the cards system should be redone. It is really expensive, the bonus are really low. Blocking cards is expensive, but I only need one. The loadouts can only be bought with mercurypoints, but I can't see the utility of that loadouts because I can't even try them without paying first.

I have bought cards in the betas, and I have played since the release with a founder's pack, but I haven't been interested in them yet.

Yes, there are some cards that are useful, but most of them are really ridiculous, bonus of 10% dmg or something like this. That won't make a difference, and it's not worth their cost.

Some example:
HP life: 100.
Kons default weapon dmg: 22-30? (I cant remember well).
Dmg with card: 24-33?
bullets to kill without bonus: 4-5.
bullets to kill with bonus: 4-5. (If the bonus or base dmg would be higher would be 3-5, great improvement)
PD: all numbers could be wrong probably, I don't remember the exact bonus or dmg.

All the economy system needs changes imo. A menu tutorial where you are forced to buy different cards and how to set them would be nice. You are leaving too much things without explaining and letting the players to explore by themselves, when the game can already be overwhelming at the start with the gameplay.

Different Missions give different rewards in terms of gold char and faction points. Also your reward depends on final score.

Just to answer a question to the best of my ability on Loadouts. Those are the 'only' way possible to change your character's setup once it is chosen. The real kicker being you can never guarantee you will be 'any' specific character since it's almost a quick draw for the most popular characters. So, if you have a loadout (not sure if you buy them per character...) this will give you the chance to swap to a style that might better help you either on the mission itself or to counter an Antagonist. Either way, like your main loadout it must be set up before the matchmaking since absolutely no tweaking to characters can be done at that point. So it's really, no choice or two choices.

the 60 hp raiders ,if you get hit once ,you're dead, and if 1 bullet touches you,you're insta downed state.
Harec pases 75% of his time crawling like the maggot you made him be.Konstantin can't be a bruiser or tank or protect anyone at all.

Quote from: ShadowofDoubts on October 06, 2017, 07:07:08 AM

concerns noted. All I want is for the mode to be fairer for both sides without it being one-sided favoritism for the raider or antagonist. A good ability would be for the antagonist to call for aid from nearby mobs or they can use aleph to provide an edge such as timed buffs or hell, being able to give aleph to elite enemies on their side. These small things don't overtly make the antagonist better seeing as they need to be able to make good decisions, but it hopefully spices the game up while keeping it fair.
Any of the proposals above should be scaled to an optimal degree, you can be summoning the entire map to help you, that would be ludicrous. The suggestions are just a utilization of your feedback and I appreciate it.

Actually, I really like that idea! The game already has an emote system, and if the Antagonist could use it to direct goons on the map, it would make being the Antagonist more rewarding AND use some buttons that currently have no purpose for them. Good idea!

blaming the player for a faulty system is one of the main reasons many games die.
,developers love your kind tou.

Hey there! (aaagain)

Prologue (Phase 2):
I find the spawn locations to be placed unfortunately to the left of the Raiders in their favour.
It's easy for 2 of them to suppress the antagonist at any time by sniping said corner and camping the one spot behind a crate nearby the stairs while one is at their turret and gets the job done.

AS the title says being the antagonist is a waste of time. Its 1.5 vs 4 nothing to make it enjoyable or even equal. Its just 4 vs 1 and the 1 is the exact same as the 1 of the 4, The antagonist would need 300% health and 150% damage to make it anything close to a competition. U can finally get 16 kills and have a 1% hope of winning but then u get 1 shot by the sniper and half your time limit is gone before u revive. Plus it feels like other people have more health in last stand mode than normal. I played as victor and took down the aussie chick in 4-5 seconds but when they are crawling they magically don't die even If I shot them 10 times. The grunts are good for 2 seconds of distraction but then 2 people can just come up and grapple u while you shoot the third.  It seems like no game company ever actually plays their games to test ideas. even if your on a roll Halec can just project onto a high spot and 1 shot you.

Game would be cool for actual multiplayer like 10v10 but antagonist feels like a last minute F@(k it add this in