Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Cryptek

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
This is whether I'm host or not, it only trigger the 30 health on the very last explosion from cookie.

2
Healing only triggers on the last explosion, I'm using the Rare version of the card.

3
Suggestions / Test room or Test Mission
 on: October 05, 2018, 07:29:45 PM 
As the title says we could desperately use a solo play test room, ala warframes Simulacrum.
In this room you would be able to test three things on static enemies:
Heroes you haven't unlocked
Cards you haven't unlocked
And weapons you haven't unlocked (Including playing around with their builds)
(obviously also stuff you have unlocked)

The purpose: To let people make informed decisions with their hard earned gold (or purchased gold) and to learn the playstyles, strengths and functionality of weapons/raiders you dont intend to unlock but expect to fight in PVP.


(And to anyone playing Valeria who crafts the Earthing, dont make the mistake I did and ignore Exterminator, without pumping it up you cant oneshot hades troopers. So that was a nice little reforge tax right there since there where no videos or in game information about the fact)

4
No thanks I'm done feeding into your bs, you're just gonna keep running in circles.
Welp there we have it, unwilling to answer a direct question because it ruins his narrative that a PVE/PVP split wouldn't heavily damage antags fun.
you're like the pot calling the kettle black.

5
This guy just keeps going in circles and destroying all his previous arguements on his own to the point where i don't even know what the heck he's going on about now lol.
Hey if you're not just trolling because you dislike antags: I'll offer you something right now if this is getting too confusing for you:

Answer this one question and I will answer anything I might have missed or any new question you have to the best of my ability, no dodging or anything. A direct answer to a direct question for the same.

Edit: Along with just handwaving "oh it'll be fine" to the population problem, if you want me to take you seriously say right now:
On an average day how many matches do you play
and then:
how many of those would you opt into PVP?
how many of those would you opt into if PVP didn't give much more than 20-30% increased rewards (because lets be fair, beating an antag isn't hard, hell I proved it IN THIS THREAD, so they aren't going to give you 100-200% increased rewards for PVP)
Because every single match that you say you'd opt out of PVP: You robbed an antag of the possibility of playing.

6
Lol I can always count on this forum to make me chuckle:)  what platform do you play on Cryptek? If its not Steam, I suggest not playing cross plat. Steam players seem to me to be repped by one dude who hates differing opinions... Seems he hates this game too. Still can't figure out why he keeps playing... Unless... He is the real troll. Antags suck to fight sometimes but I'd rather have em once in a while than just npc's all day everyday. This game would be super boring otherwise. I don't post much but I've been loving this gem for bout 7 months or so. Nothing bad to say of the game. Nothing good to say of these forum rants though... Why I stay away. But if we all did that, baby would get his bottle for sure!! I don't reply to crappy people so don't bother with the inevitable toxicity L9D;)
It's Steam, crossplay is my only hope because we don't even have a three digit population most days  :'(
And every forum has people like him, luckily I dont really care about someones opinion when they try to invalidate my existence and say I should be banned for playing the game.

7
Dodging and weaving, wow, you're good at it. Cherry picking and re-framing. I didn't even read your post beyond the first sentence. It's non productive and it's just feeding at this point. It's not worth it, you're not worth it. You haven't had anything productive to say for THIS long, and you've been going in circles while dancing out of corners, why would you say anything different at this point. You've already established yourself as Griema Wormtongue at this point, kid. Move on, move on. It's just going to be Ad Hominem at this point.
For someone claiming that I'm a troll you sure do love replying, are you secretly being Tsundere for me? I mean you did say you where a very busy man with a job that left them too stressed to deal with antagonists, so is this some sort of strange courtship of yours?

Because throwing shade sure is a great way for you to keep ignoring my questions.

8
you are trying to keep your griefing haven going because actual solutions and good ideas threaten troll PvPers.
And here we go again.
Please explain to my poor European mind how you can hold these two opinions at the same time, because that is the real political masterpiece right there:

"I think anyone who plays the PVP in this game for any purpose other than to fight 4 level 200+ navy seals kitted out to murder the antag, is a troll and should be removed and banned from even voicing their opinion"

but at the same hope anyone will take you seriously when you say:

"I dont want to remove antags"


Either you are engaging in some next level psyop and trying to change the definition of words by saying the vast majory of antags who actually play the game and dont just AFK, aren't actually antags. But instead evil trolls who should be banned.

Or you're just really not thinking about what you're saying.

And you still refuse to accept the fact that yes, removing yourself from the pool of raiders to invade IS denying someone else fun, so holding that position means you're putting your own desires above others, because you consider their version of fun inferior to yours.


As I said, you're a bigot.

9
Hypocrite. You are the one saying others should be forced to be your play thing. Stop lying. What a disingenuous fraud.
I'm the fraud? I'm the one playing the game as it is and how it was designed by the developers.
I'm the one offering constructive suggestions that would be good for the health of the game and DOESN'T ruin anyone playing the current games fun (Like making mentor matches immune to Antagonists and capping their difficulty score to allow new players the chance to learn how to play the game, since there aren't many titles that work like spacelords)
I'm the one saying that rewards should be increased to incentivize PVP for both raider and antag.

I am however not the one discrediting other peoples playstyles, saying their fun is wrong, saying my time is more important than theirs.
Neither am I the one suggesting changes that would completely remove certain aspects of the games (and therefor some peoples fun) or the one who thinks it would be great to drastically increase one part of the communities queue time.

10
You're the enemy. Nothing more. Just another PvP griefer, the worst kinds.
"Your fun is bad and wrong and mine is good and pure so therefor antagonists should be removed from the game"
"Also I'm not going to actually answer the question because that would point out that yes, I never actually wanted antags to have fun or be part of the game, I just want to remove them"

Good of you to finally show your true colors.

11
Ok at this point you're not making any sense. What?
GIT GUD is the dark souls mantra of: Attain proficiency, become better at the game, seek mastery, it's a bastardization of the phrase "Get Good".

And since you missed my earlier edit (not your fault) I'll repost it here:

Edit: Along with just handwaving "oh it'll be fine" to the population problem, if you want me to take you seriously say right now:
On an average day how many matches do you play
and then:
how many of those would you opt into PVP?
how many of those would you opt into if PVP didn't give much more than 20-30% increased rewards (because lets be fair, beating an antag isn't hard, hell I proved it IN THIS THREAD, so they aren't going to give you 100-200% increased rewards for PVP)
Every single match that you say you'd opt out of PVP: You robbed an antag of the possibility of playing.

12
Is that honestly what you want? To be able to fight teams that can't fight back?
"I cant into PVP therefor it's impossible to win against an antag"
GIT
GUD
vets have no excuses and the entire point of the thread was to protect new players in mentor matches.

13
This would only ruin the fun for antagonist that just want easy wins against bad teams. Other then the possibility longer wait time i do not see how this will ruin the fun of pvp.
There we have it again "your kind of fun isn't allowed because I disapprove".

Edit: Along with just handwaving "oh it'll be fine" to the population problem, if you want me to take you seriously say right now:
On an average day how many matches do you play
and then:
how many of those would you opt into PVP?
how many of those would you opt into if PVP didn't give much more than 20-30% increased rewards (because lets fair, beating an antag isn't hard, hell I proved it IN THIS THREAD, so they aren't going to give you 100-200% increased rewards for PVP)
Every single match that you say you'd opt out of PVP: You robbed an antag of the possibility of playing.

14
Cryptek, it's so funny that all your responses start with cherry picked statements. You latch on to one statement in a whol paragraph or two and then ignore the rest and then claim victory.
It's funny how not one single proponent of splitting it into PVP and PVE is willing to tackle the fact that:
making it optional WILL decrease the fun of antags
Even if you make the rewards SO good that it'll occasionally entice a few PVE babies, they're not going to play it all the time, you admitted as much yourself.
NONE of you are willing to answer: Why is your enjoyment worth more than the Antags?
Why is it okay to drastically increase their queue times by dramatically decreasing the ALREADY tiny pool of players they can invade

Because all of you know deep down, that even a generous offering of saying people would PVE/PVP 50/50 would dramatically change the experience of playing as an antag. (they wouldn't play nearly that much and I dare any of you to say you'd opt into PVP more often than that just for the rewards. After all if that was the case we wouldn't be having a discussion, it would just be combined rallying cry to make PVP rewards better)
You cannot say with a straight face that you aren't ruining others fun with that system and if I have to start validating my fun to you, you can fuck off. I'm not asking you to validate your enjoyment of PVE and if you're saying someone elses fun is less valid just because you dont enjoy it, your opinion is shit.

15
We're done talking after this I can confirm for myself the type of pvper you are. Just a greifer,troll and harasser. You've admitted that you just want to have the advantage against raiders that are not prepared for pvp this is disgusting. The horrible lv gap matchmaking goes both ways so this is just something that needs to be fixed anyway. I'm very disappointed.
And there we have the exact name calling that comes up from carebears anytime a PVPer tells them to suck it up. You have no empathy for the other side of the equation and it is so blatantly obvious that you view anyone who isn't on your side as the enemy, you ignore the consequences your suggestion would have because deep down: You would gladly trade every antags enjoyment for your own.

Pages: [1] 2 3